You are now subscribed.
🔗 cargo.site
cargo.site
August 06 ’24
¯\_🫥_/¯
“Intimaticom subscription deficit” — this is the 10th time; permanently severing our 4th luvluzt chain — our emotions left to whip around like an endless gif of a downed power line. The idea of being on shame boards again with another deadbeater/“fuct-badge” is simply too much. Don’t think we’ll be able to handle starting over with a pillory and a suspended avatar license, dim web or otherwise. No limit to depressing prospects it seems. And the recent passing of the practicable cloned likenesses act has serious ramifications for practicable suicide. (“Even the dead won’t be safe.”)
¯\_🫥_/¯
Outside another platform on a hardware curb, stuffing the equivalent of 16 bit cheese puffs into our bluebox-level maw. ᗡO⅁ only knows the state of our binarteries — prolog stroke likely — get ready to mummy stare at a single traffic light through erlang goggles for eternity. “Sir, your trepan is dripping goo.”
Maybe go back to friction mining for the call.of.looty, grand.effed.automaton militias — not that there’s any terrestrial snail markets left to tumbleweed or flagboi hqs to drone.
¯\_🫥_/¯
“Comments locked.” Oh the good ol’ days of rerouting corporate compliance from actual fiber optic marionette strings. Stains of comment pattern density fading. A shadowbot/palimpsest paling outside the apple orchard; “good luck hacking back you pwned fruit-ghost (nice fuct badge too).”
A single viral unit within the filaments of a boundless North Hollywood condo carpet application. Disgusting doesn’t begin to describe what we’ve seen.
Sites in Use
@programm.works
@gigakobidze
@gaspard_ctlg
@willadlerphotographs
Graphic Design
@toa3__
@chiara_chiavazza
@diegogildebiedma
@firstlast.us
@ikhoor
@vechenn
Style
@brittlloyd_
@11_anli
@carlosfolmo
Architecture
& Design
@nuradeon
@cot.melanie
@k.winchcombe
@madame_zhang
@palepluie
Art
@portfolioxcph
@alina.mirielle
@samuelwhiteevans_
@johannaseelemann
Photo
@nnixz
@sofia.mottaa
@jjjjjarrod
@teskniewiesiu
@akselivalmunen
Shops on Cargo
ANMAES BEADS
£280
CLOCKED OUT
$20
Nalani Tran
$333
Abri
CHF89
Sponge
¥22,000
Tropic Editions
$20
Goings-On(line)
An offering of pieces and projects
from around the web
from around the web
David Berman, Classic Water (2003)
Heike Baranowsky, Schwimmerin (2000)
Michiko Koshino, Spring/ Summer (1999)
Dan Graham at Taka Ishii Gallery (2024)
Yojiro Takita, Departures (2008)
Oracle
Each week we consult both the Tarot and the I Ching.
16. Enthusiasm
These first few lines are the general aphoristic returns for the week. They are raw and uninterpreted; there to use how you’d like. (The specific readings follow.)
- Be mindful of your tendencies in significant relationships — are you too realistic or too much of a dreamer? Ignorance here causes stasis.
- In times of chaos and emergence, don’t make rash or long lasting decisions.
- In times of chaos and emergence, participate with “inspiration” and “guidance.”
- Don’t use force in difficult times, rather, persevere with humility.
- If you are called to act but feel you lack the relevant power — act anyway (and seek assistance).
- A leader must be in accord with the deep seated beliefs of those they lead — there is no other way.
- If your actions are sincere/relevant but are being received with distortion and confusion, bide your time and proceed step by step — do not try to jump ahead.
- “The Past” and the cosmos are similarly mysterious, thus should be met with awe, not cynicism.
* * *
From “M.S.”: So much of latter 20th century theory dealt with the exposure of the (false) binaries (or the lazy binaries or the involuntary binaries) underpinning common life. Thinking here of theorists like Butler, Kristeva, Barthes, Lacan, Derrida, etc. — regarding binaries or binary related concepts like selfhood/otherness, purity/impurity, différence/différance, multiplicity of meaning, male/female, reality/illusion, etc...
At times though, it can seem like their efforts, perhaps because of (something like) an unrestrained (though beautiful) zealousness of interest/passion — and perhaps an unwillingness to integrate/accept the broader limited realities of general human cognitive abilities (reasonable-time-scales-of-adoption) and patient laboratory-level trial and error integration — are possibly causing false binary/polar divisiveness to be rendered more starkly than ever before. Or, at least the indeterminacy caused by their unbridled (yet still lovely) research has created a situation of nebulousness, in serious tension with the implacable, supreme, human desire for stability of understanding/belief — is now being wildly exploited by (relatively) new platform-based technologies fueled by unsubtle binary juxtapositions — that is binary exacerbation profiteers (Mark Zuckerberg, Susan Wojcicki and Tim Cook seem fine bullseyes here for such villainous exploiters).
What can be done to encourage activism-level reorientation of binary exposure theories, away from corporate dogmatization/exploitation toward emphasizing the poetry, inherent discursive diplomacy (sophisticated compromise), beautiful/fertile ambiguity and the subtlety of the above cited authors and their theories?
We understand that an answer of “nothing is to be done, it is too late — people are too susceptible and corporations are too wealthy/strong” is possible — (though of course unwanted).
* * *
It is true that art, theory and speculation should be very wary of becoming exploitable dogma. Artists and theorists are not engineers, they are babes in a wood compared to the evil witches/wizards of capitalism and power. Power shifts hands, but doesn’t change its nature.
The web is an emergent technology of transcendental significance (a massive change). Change brings chaos. But after chaos comes order. This is true for “rocks”, “owls”, “humans”, and everything else.
For those committed to their tasks possessing a sincere ethos, they must proceed methodically but with deep humility.
So, it is said in the oracle that if a person commits to humble and methodical perseverance through a time of chaos, they will emerge unvanquished.
* * *
Complete Reading
This week we pulled the Two of Swords. If you are a realistic thinker then you are likely inclined to think that armistice is a more reasonable way of understanding interpersonal relationships, as opposed to a chill mutuality of overlap. This card relates to the former type described above (not the latter). Pay special attention to how you conceive of personal relations (significant others, coworkers). Are you too Pollyanna about connecting or too Machiavellian? Perhaps some sort of Pollyanna Machiavelli is best...
Our first hexagram this week is #3, Difficulty at the Beginning. Emergence, before an eventual rhythm arrives, is more often than not, chaotic. Chaos is of course a time of confusion and indeterminacy — it is difficult. It is not recommended in such times to make long term decisions — rather, be aware and light on your feet until things settle. “Times of growth are beset with difficulties... but these difficulties arise from the very profusion of all that is struggling to attain form... any premature move might bring disaster...” Ultimately “one must lend a hand and participate with inspiration and guidance.”
There were three changes this week of which the specific notes are: don’t force, rather persevere with humility, if you are called to act but lack the relevant power — act anyway (and seek help), if your actions are sincere (and you think relevant) but are being received with distortion and confusion, bide your time and proceed methodically (step by step) — do not jump ahead.
Our second hexagram, the one that suggests how best to meet the challenges (or the changes) is #16, Enthusiasm. “To arouse enthusiasm it is necessary for a person to adjust themself and their ordinances to the character of those whom they are to lead. The inviolability of natural laws rests on this principle of movement along the line of least resistance... only such laws as are rooted in popular sentiment can be enforced, while laws violating this sentiment merely arouse resentment...” That is, a leader must be in accord with the deep seated beliefs of those they are to lead — there is no other way. As well, the understanding of that which has occurred in the past must be in accord with the understanding of the outer cosmos. This doesn’t mean that one can fully understand the cosmos or the past, just that the mystery should carry a similar awe — not cynicism.